THE IRREPRESSIBLE TUN

“There is, no way, the behemoth, can, be rectified, from, the inside” said Tun. “people from the outside must take the opportunity to correct, what needs, to be, corrected” he continued. “There is actually no room for objections to be heard either. Everyone, has, to, tow, the line. Only one thing left, to do- no two- way about it, deny: them 2004 that they like to lord about, give them 1969 instead or more or less”. Shouted Tun: from the peripheries. Exactly, what happened, but, an, over kill, no doubt, and literally speaking, quite- so. Five states were lost and together with it BN’s very fragile foundation. Tun has overshot the target intended into another that was not. Instead of, maiming he has dealt the killing blow. The juggernaut can never be repaired now, its wound much too fatal.
Howsoever not unlike the numerous times before, the good Tun would never say he has helped in the deicide. Considering that, there were other more glaring factors that contributed to the unavoidable demise of, the- Monolith, Tun’s part in the entire exercise must never be dismissed. Even though, the very minutiae bit. The likelihood of him saying it was unavoidable but entirely not his fault, would again, be reiterated.
Now he is calling for his successor’s resignation stating reasons of ineptness and familial preferences over and above party and state’s interests, to the extent of leading a cohesive front against the leadership of the party. Should, he be, asked why? The only retort must be, He did not plan for it but he is, called, by the, disgruntled members to take the lead. Maybe so but one can also decline for somebody else, the, Tengku- perhaps. Why could be another question asked did The Tun not support Tengku’s bid for The Presidency yet agree with his call for the EGM? To that query he answered about anybody could contest.
Whether or not he should apologize to, the Judges, he said, why, must he, or the government even. Yes, he was the Emperor then but only that he- said, on the other, hand there were others, who wanted to do what they did to the Judges. They were adamant in what they were bent upon, so it was really their fault. Correct, correct, correct, or how, was that again?
When asked why was that he said- Anwar was iniquitously, done upon and it was downright cruel as to what was inflicted onto him together with the words, his own, that he was the PM then and being one, he was, able to do things. Adding further the quaint argument of power allowing about anything to, be effected, deeds or misdeeds among others.
To that he answered it was in the heat of the event and he was just being sarcastic.
Sir, Malaysians tak mudah lupa sir, don’t know about you lah.